site stats

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

WebOn February 14, 1963, the Philippine Air Lines Employees' Association (PALEA) and the Philippine Air Lines Supervisors' Association (PALSA) — petitioners in G.R. No. L … WebPhilippine Airlines, Inc. vs. NLRC. SO ORDERED. (p. 40, Rollo.) PAL appealed to the NLRC. On August 19, 1988, the NLRC through Commissioner Encarnacion, with Presiding Commissioner Bonto-Perez and Commissioner Maglaya concurring, found no evidence of unfair labor practice committed by PAL and affirmed the dismissal of PALEA’s charge.

PAL, PALEA settle 2-year labor dispute [Philippines]

WebPHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA) ET AL. v. NLRC, PAL, and GSIS In relation to the first case (PALEA and PALSA v. PAL), PAL was ordered to pay … WebPeople v. Veneracion, 249 SCRA 244 (1995) 6. Parreño v. Commission on Audit, 523 SCRA 390 (2007) 7. Islamic Da’wah Council of the Philippines, Inc. v. Office of the Executive Secretary, 405 SCRA 497 (2003) 8. Calalang v. Williams, 70 SCRA 726 (1940) 9. Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company v. haven house shelter manitoulin https://wjshawco.com

G.R. No. L-18559 June 30, 1964 - PALEA vs PAL - ChanRobles

WebJul 8, 2024 · Philippine Airlines, Inc. [PAL] Vs. Philippine Airlines Employees Association [PALEAJ], Eugene Soriano, et al./Renato Ebio, et al. Vs. PALEA and Eugene Soriano/PALEA and Eugene Soriano Vs. Renato Ebio, et al. G.R. No. 243460/G.R. No. 243486/G.R. No. 243528. July 8, 2024 WebJul 23, 2008 · WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Office renders judgment declaring that Philippine Airlines, Inc., illegally retrenched One Thousand Four Hundred (1,400) … WebNov 13, 2013 · Philippine Airlines (PAL) and the Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) have ended a two-year labor dispute by agreeing to reinstate all … haven house services inc

G.R. No. L-18559 June 30, 1964 - PALEA vs PAL - ChanRobles

Category:157375826-LABREL-cases5-doc.doc - G.R. No. 76673 June 22,...

Tags:Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

PHILIPPINE AIRLINES INC. v. SECRETARY OF LABOR AND …

WebThe Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) filed a complaint before t he National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). PALEA contended that PAL, by its unilateral implementation of the Code, was guilty of unfair labor practice, spec ifically Paragraphs E and G of Article 249 and Article 253 of the Labor Code. WebEspiritu, 22 after Philippine Airlines (PAL) and PAL Employees Association (PALEA) entered into an agreement, which includes the provision to suspend the PAL-PALEA CBA for 10 years, several employees questioned its validity via a petition for certiorari directly to the Supreme Court.

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Did you know?

WebPALEA and Dawal, et al. filed before the Labor Arbiter a Complaint[81]dated January 31, 2001 for unfair labor practices and illegal dismissal.[82] Their labor suit[83]was … WebPetitioners and petitioners-in-intervention filed the instant petitions for prohibition under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court seeking to prohibit the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) and the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and its Secretary from implementing the following agreements executed by the …

WebPAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA 301 (1993) FACTS: On March 15, 1985, the Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) completely revised its 1966 Code of Discipline. The Code was circulated … WebAug 13, 1993 · Thus, on August 20, 1985, the Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) filed a complaint before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for unfair labor practice (Case No. NCR-7-2051-85) with the following remarks: "ULP with arbitrary implementation of PAL's Code of Discipline without notice and prior discussion …

WebApr 3, 2024 · 7/28/2024 PAL v. PALEA. 1/3. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(PALEA), respondent. Facts: On 6 … WebPALEA's petition was an incident of Case No. 43-IPA (6), a petition previously filed by herein petitioner PAL seeking to declare the strike staged by PALEA on January 25, …

WebAug 13, 1993 · PALEA alleged that copies of the Code had been circulated in limited numbers; that being penal in nature the Code must conform with the requirements of sufficient publication, and that the Code was arbitrary, oppressive, and prejudicial to the rights of the employees.

WebJul 4, 2024 · Petitioner: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) Respondents: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (NLRC), LABOR ARBITER ISABEL P. ORTIGUERA, and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA) DOCTRINE: Indeed, industrial peace cannot be achieved if the employees are denied their just participation in … born feet first meaningWebFeb 10, 2024 · The Philippines Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) agreed to give up workers’ rights to collectively bargain with the company for 10 years in order to free the company to “rehabilitate.” born feinkost gmbhhttp://source.gosupra.com/docs/decision/36543 born female subliminalWebPALEA, as the winner in that election, was certified by the BLR as the exclusive bargaining agent of all the rank-and-file employee of the Philippine Airlines, Inc. PALEA and PAL signed a 3-year collective bargaining agreement effective October 1, … haven house shelter raleigh ncWeb1. declaring the defendant, Philippine Air Lines, Inc. otherwise known as ‘PAL’ as a government-controlled corporation and, therefore, falling within the purview of Republic … haven house south sioux city neWebPALEA vs PAL Inc (70 SCRA 244. 1976) 93. Odango vs NLRC (GR no. 147420. Jun 10 2004) 94. National Development Co vs CIR National Textile Workers Union (GR no. L-15422. ... Philippine Airlines vs National Labor Relations Commission (GR no. 55159. Jun 22 1989) 9. SSS vs SSS Supervisors’ Union-CUGCO (GR no. L-31832. haven house south siouxWebPHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner ... PALEA filed another grievance asking for lifting of, or at least, holding in abeyance the execution of said penalty. The said grievance was forthwith denied but the penalty of suspension with respect to respondent Ramos was modified, such that his suspension which was originally from January 15, 1985 to ... haven house spring hill